Forum Topics

Crusade for Fairness

Crusade for FairnessAccording to a poll for a conservative think-tank, the growing number of young Muslims is embracing radical Islam. Young Muslims hold aggressively more extreme views than their parents. The think-tank blames multiculturalism for producing a generation of young Muslims who champion their right to be different. Multiculturalism is nothing to do with community cohesion and at the same time it does not divide people. British society is already divided because of institutional racism and extremism by all political parties. British society can tolerate foreigners as economic slaves but is unwilling to accept them as human beings. Muslims are human beings with social, emotional and spiritual needs and demands. They are not just economics. It is not 9/11 or 7/7; Islam was always portrayed as a threat to Western societies. Fear and the emotions that accompany it, has become a part of the public mindset. Headlines about waves of immigrants and fears of being swamped by foreigners are not much different now and they were in the past, and it is enough to make you wonder if we really were welcome in this country. Britain seems to be more in the grip of Muslim – Mania – an obsession with all things Islamic. Not a single Muslim group, Masajid, Imams, Muslim schools are promoting separation. Muslim girls are doing well at schools and universities. It is a myth to say that they are being held back by their fathers. Muslim community would like to see more and more state funded Muslim schools, where Muslim boys and girls could be educated separately by Muslim teachers.  In the past Muslim community was victim of Paki-bashing in all walks of life by the British society and the British establishment did nothing to tackle their suffering. Now the Muslim community is victim of terrorism by the British establishment, despite the fact that majority of Muslim youths were British born and educated. They speak English in local accents. They pick up English from play grounds and from the streets. British schooling never tried to teach them Standard English to follow the National Curriculum. State schools were and still are reluctant to teach Arabic and Urdu to Muslim pupils, making them cut off from the cultural roots. They are even mis-fit for their own communities and at the same time British society never accept them as British. Brutishness is often equated with Englishness, ‘whiteness’ and also with Christianity. A Pakistani does not, by being born in England become an Englishman. In law he becomes British citizen by birth; infact he is a Pakistani still. Britain was puzzling over how a few young Muslim men, British born and educated, could feel so alienated that they wanted to blow up their fellow British citizens. I blame the British education system which is the home of institutional racism and native teachers, who are in no way role models for Muslim children. The teaching of citizenship called for greater focus on ‘core British values’. Britishness is an artificial concept and it cannot fix the fundamental flaws in the education system. Screaming abuse, the use of aggressive, two-fingered, four-lettered words and self-righteous hatred of foreigners have become typical Britishness. A liberal society prides itself on tolerance, upholding of civil rights, and celebration of diversity and individual space. These attributes are a lot easier to preach and are not always easy to practice. Iftikhar Ahmad www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 7133d4 Comments ● 7044d

Association of Muslim Governors

Association of Muslim GovernorsThere is a shortage of school governors and it is difficult to find a Muslim governor in a state schools. A campaign has started to recruit more and more Muslim governors.  In 2003, there were only 53 Muslim schools and now there are more than 126 full-time Muslim schools and more are in the pipe line because of racism and anti-Muslim feeling in state schools. The silent majority of Muslim parents would like to send their children to Muslim schools. In my opinion, AOMG and MCB should campaign for more state funded Muslim schools rather than asking for more Muslim governors in state schools. Muslim children are disadvantaged by an education system that perpetuates inequalities. British media and schooling tried their best to mirror Islamic cultural values as inferior, backward traditions and unworthy. This cultural obliteration is being made possible by the negation of the right to speak Urdu and Arabic as well as choice of dress.I think that Muslim governors in state schools are not going to bring any kind of change. I became the first Muslim governor in Newham in the 70s but left after three years. I was the only Muslim governors and I found it a waste of time. In the 90s, Stratford school in Newham was opted out by the board of governors from the LEA. Majority of governors were Muslims. Within a year there was a conflict with the non-Muslim head teacher and the Secretary of State for Education dismissed all the governors and appointed new governors. The head teacher took early retirement and was awarded round about two hundred and fifty thousands pounds as a reward for getting rid of Muslim governorsThere are hundreds of state schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion, those schools should be designated as Muslim community schools. State funded Muslim schools are the solution and not the problem. Muslim pupils are bilingual. Bilingualism strengthens their cultural identity and foster educational success. It is such a gift to a child, that it is irresponsible not to encourage its natural development. Trilingual 11-years olds outperform monolingual children in reading tests. They are five times more likely to get five A-C grades at GCSE than those who don’t. Bilingualism and biculturalism should be valued and recognized by the teachers. If children’s education leads them to believe that the language of their parents is somehow “inferior”, the chances of their feeling out of place in their extra-familial environment are likely to be greater (“banlieux” of Paris, November 2005?). Telling them to “go home”, to a “home” where they were not born, is no sort of a solution. The price of ignoring children’s bilingualism is educational failure and social exclusion. Learning to read in three languages has social, emotional and cognitive advantages, according to a study of 5-7 years olds in Watford. The children learn English, Urdu and Arabic at the same time at the age of five.Iftikhar Ahmad www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 7063d7 Comments ● 7044d

An Open Letter to Ruth Kelly

An Open Letter to Ruth KellyAccording to Ruth Kelly, approved citizenship lessons may be introduced in Muslim schools and supplementary schools to eradicate extremism and violence in Muslim communities. Muslim schools help to strengthen community cohesion, not undermine it. This is the reason why all Teachers Unions do not like to see the rapid growth of Muslim schools after 9/11 and 7/7. According to a world wide survey, Islam was found to have little to do with radicalization or antipathy towards western culture. The war on terror has radicalized Muslims around the world to unprecedented levels of anti-American feeling. The wealthier and better –educated were more likely to be radicalized. This is a climate of growing mistrust between Islam and the West. Muslims are a group causing very little terrorism in Europe, while at the same time; Muslims are much more likely to be arrested on suspicion of terrorism. There were 498 incidents in eleven EU countries in 2006. The truth is that only one out of 498 terrorist attacks was carried out by Muslims. But the Western and especially British media are not interested on reporting such incidents. More than half of Muslims were arrested on suspicion of terrorism.  The native children need citizenship education as well as Islamic education because they have no respect and are reluctant to tolerate those who are different. Government figures revealed that the number of pupils suspended from schools for racist abuse rose nearly one-third in a year. The schools are reluctant to report racist bullying because they do not want their schools to gain a reputation for having racist problems. Blackburn and Burnley were identified as being among the country’s most divided areas, where racial tension is very high. The wholly negative attitudes towards Islam in the West have a very long history and have a palpable feel more than ever at the moment. Islamophobia is alive and well. The mass media, popular culture and the leading forces in world politics are all mostly hostile to and in their representations of Islam, and Muslims. British right-wing target Muslims as the new “enemy other”. Muslims in Britain are disempowered, disenfranchised, disenchanted, disaffected groups at the margins of economy, society and polity. Identification with Islam is strengthening among young generations of Muslims, both as a reaction to racist hostility as well as a desire to understand Islam. The brutal colonial history, combined with racism which endemic in the host country, this creates an atmosphere of mistrust.   It is the state schools as well as British media and politicians, creating a sense of intolerance in all walks of British life. There is a tendency in the Western media to portray Islam in a negative way. The media stirs up fear and prejudice towards Islam and reinforce the image of Islam as the enemy. The Western media is stoking up fear of Islam and rely on “simplistic notion of the battle between cultures.” Lord Falconer’s speech to the National Association of Head teachers’ has many contradictions. He talks about freedom yet he wants to take this freedom from Muslim students. He talks about tolerance yet he encourages intolerance towards Muslims. Jack Straw, Phil Woolas, Bill Rammell, David Davis and the list is endless of the politicians that have created an atmosphere of fear and demonisation towards innocent Muslims. The speech reinforces the discrimination towards Muslims legitimised by the Government and the Lord Chancellor. The number of racist statements has increased dramatically in Europe. The number of racist statements reportedly grew by between 25 and 45 Percent in France, Netherlands, Britain, Italy and Belgium. In one EU country, racism increased by as much as 70%. According to EUMC, the increase can partly be attributed to easier procedures for reporting racism and more publicity on the problem. A leader of the Freedom Party said, if Muslims want to stay in the Netherlands, they should tear out half of the Koran and throw it away and they should not listen to the Imams. Islam is a violent religion. Third World War has begun. In the past he voiced his fear of a “tsunami of Islamisation in the Netherlands”. Islam is depicted as a threat to Christian identity. It has produced an advertisement showing an Islamic Crescent above an ancient church with these words: ‘This is the true hidden desire of Muslims’. The interior minister of Austria called for the banning of hijab-clad teachers and asserting that 45% of Muslims defy assimilation. In Belgium, the editor of Het Velb insulted the local Muslim community by referring to it as a breeding ground for thousands of Jihad candidates. Deep in the European subconscious is the memory of a war with the Muslims. How Sicily was lost, how half of Spain was conquered and finally how Constantinople was conquered on Tuesday, May29, 1453, a date that lives in infamy. It was the end of Christianity in Turkey and that was to become Istanbul. Brussels launches sermons about gender equality, though it should be remembered that Turkey gave women the vote before Belgium.      The British Government has continued to create an atmosphere of hatred and fear since 7/7 towards Muslims. Ant-terror laws, indiscriminate arrests of innocent Muslim youths and demonising Muslims that dresses in certain way. It is the mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the Muslim way of life, not the other way round. One can learn hospitality, tolerance and generosity from Muslims.Islam isn’t the sickness. It is the cure. It is one of liberty and equality. Secularists and followers of other religions regard Islam with something approaching panic. It is wrong to say that Islam has turned Osama bin Laden into a devil. It is the Secularist Western policies have turned Osama and others against the West. The world needs Islam to address the moral issues. America and Europe are wealthy, but they are morally impoverished. Broken families, drugs, booze, youth gangs, crime, neglect of children and the old, the sheer boredom of shopaholicism, terrorism, the inner-cities slums, materialism itself, are all the marks of a global society in decline. Children need to be taught to distinguish between right and wrong. Iftikhar Ahmad www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 7050d4 Comments ● 7044d

Wandsworth Museum Campaign Group: Bulletin #4

The WMCG has warmly welcomed the news that a local benefactor - the Hintze Family Charitable Foundation - has come forward and offered £1 million to re-establish the Museum in West Hill under an independent trust and a further £1 million to run it for five years. This proposal includes the De Morgan Collection which was to be evicted from West Hill Library as part of the Council’s plans for Wandsworth town centre. At the same time as announcing this very positive news on 28th March, the Council proceeded to confirm their original timetable and process for the closure of the Museum as part of its plan to amalgamate West Hill and Alvering Libraries, using the Museum’s Court House premises in Garratt Lane as their combined location for a central library.  We now have the contradictory situation where the clock is ticking towards a closure date of September despite the Council having reversed its stance on the future of the Museum and having accepted the Hintze’s offer to help save it.Faced with the decision of the Council to proceed with closure of the Museum and eventually transfer it to West Hill, the challenges that face campaigners and residents are:1. to persuade the Council to retain those members of staff whose unique skills and experience have made the Museum such a beacon of excellence so that they are available to transfer, if they wish, to the new Museum when it is established;2. to ensure the Council preserves the Museum’s pioneering outreach services to schools and other community groups so that these too can be continued at the new museum with the minimum interruption;3. to minimise the gap in time between closing the Museum and re-opening it at West Hill;4. to minimise the costs of relocating the Museum to West Hill so that the generous donation from the Hintze Foundation is not dissipated in unnecessary storage and handling; and5. to work effectively with the Council and the Hintze Foundation to ensure that the new Museum has a solid start and strong financial platform.If the above factors are not carefully managed, there are real risks to the future of the Museum even with the generous donation from the Hintze Foundation.  Without the existing staff, with their specialist expertise and local knowledge, and with the artefacts put into storage, the Museum will lose its hard-won national Accreditation.  Without Accreditation it will not qualify for the various museum grants that are available, money it will certainly need for its future survival.In addition, a closed Museum may well have to return artefacts it has received on loan and will no longer be able to continue the excellent education programme for schools.  Everything will have to begin again from scratch.These issues are being urgently addressed by the Wandsworth Museum Campaign Group now that the initial priority of securing base funding has been achieved. WMCG is a strictly non-political committee with members from across the political spectrum, including many with relevant professional experience in areas such as conservation, heritage, financial & project management, marketing, buildings and architecture. The Group’s focus is now on the essential detailed planning that the Museum will need to make the most effective possible use of the new trust framework as well as to best use the funds offered by the Hintze Foundation. To this end the WMCG has approached the Hintze Foundation, Wandsworth Borough Council, the Museums Libraries Archives Council, the Museum of London, the London Society and the Association of Independent Museums to ensure the Group is fully appraised of how and where it can best contribute to the transfer, establishment and running of the new Museum.In spite of the substantial donation offered by the Hintze Foundation, WMCG is not complacent and in order to retain the award winning status for which the Museum has already been recognised WMCG needs your support (especially anyone with database management skills). So please follow the story in the press, on this and other community websites and if you’re interested to find out more or wish to become a Friend of Wandsworth Museum please email your contact details to: WandsworthMuseumGroup@hotmail.co.uk

Cedric Peachey ● 7098d0 Comments ● 7098d

Crusade for Fairness

Crusade for FairnessAccording to a poll for a conservative think-tank, the growing number of young Muslims is embracing radical Islam. Young Muslims hold aggressively more extreme views than their parents. The think-tank blames multiculturalism for producing a generation of young Muslims who champion their right to be different. Multiculturalism is nothing to do with community cohesion and at the same time it does not divide people. British society is already divided because of institutional racism and extremism by all political parties. British society can tolerate foreigners as economic slaves but is unwilling to accept them as human beings. Muslims are human beings with social, emotional and spiritual needs and demands. They are not just economics. It is not 9/11 or 7/7; Islam was always portrayed as a threat to Western societies. Fear and the emotions that accompany it, has become a part of the public mindset. Headlines about waves of immigrants and fears of being swamped by foreigners are not much different now and they were in the past, and it is enough to make you wonder if we really were welcome in this country. Britain seems to be more in the grip of Muslim – Mania – an obsession with all things Islamic. Not a single Muslim group, Masajid, Imams, Muslim schools are promoting separation. Muslim girls are doing well at schools and universities. It is a myth to say that they are being held back by their fathers. Muslim community would like to see more and more state funded Muslim schools, where Muslim boys and girls could be educated separately by Muslim teachers.  In the past Muslim community was victim of Paki-bashing in all walks of life by the British society and the British establishment did nothing to tackle their suffering. Now the Muslim community is victim of terrorism by the British establishment, despite the fact that majority of Muslim youths were British born and educated. They speak English in local accents. They pick up English from play grounds and from the streets. British schooling never tried to teach them Standard English to follow the National Curriculum. State schools were and still are reluctant to teach Arabic and Urdu to Muslim pupils, making them cut off from the cultural roots. They are even mis-fit for their own communities and at the same time British society never accept them as British. Brutishness is often equated with Englishness, ‘whiteness’ and also with Christianity. A Pakistani does not, by being born in England become an Englishman. In law he becomes British citizen by birth; infact he is a Pakistani still. Britain was puzzling over how a few young Muslim men, British born and educated, could feel so alienated that they wanted to blow up their fellow British citizens. I blame the British education system which is the home of institutional racism and native teachers, who are in no way role models for Muslim children. The teaching of citizenship called for greater focus on ‘core British values’. Britishness is an artificial concept and it cannot fix the fundamental flaws in the education system. Screaming abuse, the use of aggressive, two-fingered, four-lettered words and self-righteous hatred of foreigners have become typical Britishness. A liberal society prides itself on tolerance, upholding of civil rights, and celebration of diversity and individual space. These attributes are a lot easier to preach and are not always easy to practice. Iftikhar Ahmad www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 7134d0 Comments ● 7134d

Criticism and Praise for Muslim Schools

Criticism and Praise for Muslim SchoolsMuslim schools offer a more conducive environment for learning because Islam teaches respect and stress learning whereas in state schools, there is a high level of disrespect. There is no evidence that Muslim schools foster separatism and hatred and indoctrinate children with values that endanger shared society. There is a positive co-relation between faith, culture and language. Faith needs culture and languages to flourish. According to a research, children who study the language and culture of their parents may achieve more and become more involved citizens. Migrant Muslims speak variety of languages. State schools as well as Muslim schools give lip service to the community languages but majority of Muslim schools completely ignore or discourage community languages. The chairman of the Association of Muslim Schools Mr.Idrees Mears, a native revert totally rejects the teaching of Urdu and other languages. The same opinion was expressed by the head of state funded Islamia School as well as by the Chairman of the Nida Trust. They are not in a position to understand the needs and demands of the bilingual children because they are themselves monolinguals. It is a well known fact that social and emotional education comes with ones own language, literature and poetry. Pakistani children suffer more than other children. They speak different languages at home and when they go to the Masajid they are exposed to Urdu and Arabic. At schools they are exposed to English and at the age of 11 are exposed to European languages. Now European languages are introduced at Primary level, but Urdu is totally ignored and discouraged by the state as well as by the Muslim schools. English, Arabic and Urdu must be introduced at nursery level so that the children can grow up with three languages. We have already lost three generation and the fourth one is in the process of losing its linguistic and cultural identity by not learning Urdu. The Muslim community is suffering because of social and cultural problems of high rate of divorce, run away young girls, low academic achievements, drug addiction, drinking, teenage pregnancies, disrespect for their parents and elders, forced marriages and honour killings. It is all because our youth are cut off from their cultural roots and languages. I blame state schools because they have never been serious in the teaching of Urdu, Arabic and other community languages.   An American research reveals in 2005 that bilingual learners with no education in their first language take longer to learn English and a bilingual learner with a good education in their own language do best of all. Muslim schools are committing the same mistake by ignoring community languages. Even DFES and OFSTEAD are not serious about the importance of bilingualism and bilingual education. Their priority is the teaching of English language. No body is denying the importance of English as an economic language but equally important is the first languages of the children for social and emotional literacy.I have been campaigning for Muslim schools since early 70s because there is no place for foreign cultures, languages and faiths in state schools. Muslim children are victim of racial abuse and discrimination. Neither Muslim community nor the DFE paid any attention to my proposal. Muslim community kept on setting up Masajid for worshiping and for the education of their children. Masajid help Muslim children to recite the Holy Quran without understanding and teach them how to perform their prayers. DFE introduced Multicultural education for the integration and assimilation of the Muslims. I regard Muslim schools not just Faith schools but more or less bilingual schools. I set up the first Muslim school in Forest Gate London in 1981. Special attention was given to Standard English, Arabic and Urdu languages along with National Curriculum. But due to its closure, it could not become a model school for others to follow. Islamia School, founded by Yusuf Islam became the model school where there is no place for the teaching of Urdu and other community languages and only Arabic is taught.The sound knowledge of ones owns language would appear to help – not hinder the acquisition of a second language and bilingual children may even have cognitive advantages and that the ability to speak more than one language is going to be increasingly important for the world of the future. Therefore, Muslim children and young Muslims have potentially a major educational advantage, although sadly this is not being developed well at present. British policy makers now recognise bilingualism as an educational asset rather than a problem. Education plays a central role in the transmission of languages from one generation to the next. The teaching of mother tongues is essential in terms of culture and identity. Arabic is a religious language for the Muslims but for Pakistanis, Urdu is also essential for culture and identity. Blind Muslim children in Bradford are learning to read Arabic and Urdu Braille, by a blind teacher who traveled from Pakistan. Now blind Muslim children are not going to miss out on culture, religion, language and the social aspects and integration into their own community and identity. Majority of Muslim children are from Pakistan. They need to learn Arabic and Urdu to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. Bilingualism and bilingual education should be part and parcel of each and every Muslim school. The problem is that most of Muslim schools are running by British educated Muslims who are made monolinguals by state schools. They do not feel the charm of bilingualism. They have never been given the chance to learn Arabic and Urdu along with English. An English man is proud of his language, culture and faith or no faith. In the same way a Muslim should be proud of his faith, languages and cultures. In my opinion at least three hours a day must be given for the teaching of English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages from nursery level. The teaching of Standard English will help them to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. Iftikhar Ahmadwww.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk    

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 7171d0 Comments ● 7171d